The VC's Awards for Programs that Enhance Learning recognise programs and services that contribute to the quality of student learning and the student experience at the University of Tasmania. These awards are given to exemplary programs and services whose effectiveness has been demonstrated through strenuous evaluation.
There will be a maximum of two VC's Awards for Programs that Enhance Learning each year across all categories, with winners receiving $5,000 each.
- All members of staff, both academic and professional, are eligible to apply
- Individual and team applications are invited in each category
- Winners are ineligible to reapply for the same award within a five year period
- Winners may immediately submit an application for a different VC's award (Teaching Excellence or Medal)
- Previously unsuccessful applicants in any category are immediately eligible to reapply
Nomination, application and selection procedures
Refer to the Nomination and Application page for further information.
Paper must be A4 and plain white. Margins must be at least 2cm with clear definition between paragraphs. Font must be a minimum of 11 point Arial or Calibri. Individual pages that do not meet the requirements, for instance by exceeding the pages limits, will be removed.
The application is comprised of:
- Application cover sheet (Word 59.0 KB)
- Written statement (10 pages)
- Supporting materials (see information below)
- References (2 references of 1 page each)
Application cover sheet
Program applications must select one of the following six categories:
- Global citizenship and internationalisation
- Widening participation
- Educational partnerships and collaborations with other organisations
- Innovation in curriculum design and pedagogy practice
- Postgraduate education
- Student experiences and learning support services
Applicants must complete the application cover sheet, cross-checking their application against the checklist provided.
The core element of the application is a written statement describing the program, specifically addressing each of the four assessment criteria. It is essential that this statement provides a range of evidence to support claims in line with each criterion. The written statement is limited to ten (10) A4 pages in total.
The written statement should be presented in order, under the following headings:
Synopsis (maximum 200 words, written in the third person)
The synopsis should provide a clear and concise description of the program and its contribution to student learning.
An overview of the program and its context. The overview should summarise the claims made against the assessment criteria and the impact of the program.
1. Distinctiveness, coherence and clarity of purpose
Extent to which the program has clear objectives and systematic approaches to coordination, implementation and evaluation.
2. Influence on student learning and the student experience
Extent to which the program targets identified needs and directly or indirectly enhances student learning, student engagement and/or the overall student experience of higher education.
3. Breadth of impact
Extent to which the program has led to widespread benefits for students, staff, the institution, and/or other institutions, consistent with the purpose of the program.
4. Addressing equity and diversity
Extent to which the program promotes and supports equity and inclusiveness by improving access, participation and outcomes for diverse student groups.
Applicants will be assessed on the evidence provided in their response to the criteria against the Citation and Vice-Chancellor's Award assessment rubric. The assessment panel will consider how each applicant's contribution has:
- Influenced student learning, student engagement or the overall student experience
- Gained recognition from fellow staff, the institution, and/or the broader community
- Been sustained for a period of no less than two years, not including time taken for development or trial of any activity
- Claims for excellence which are supported by formal and informal evaluation
- Shown creativity, imagination or innovation, irrespective of whether the approach involves traditional learning environments or technology-based developments
- Information contained in student data, student surveys, supporting materials, and references submitted by the nominee
A broad range of evidence in support of the claims against these criteria must be provided. The views of students, collaborators and/or colleagues should be woven into this statement as appropriate, as they will be a key element in the assessment of applications.
The conclusion should draw elements of the narrative together to provide a cohesive final statement.
Applicants should use their preferred reference style and include a reference list within the 10 pages.
It is strongly recommended that applicants include additional materials supporting their claims against the assessment criteria. The relevance of the materials must be made clear in the written statement. Applicants may choose to submit one or two of the following support materials:
- A link to a three-minute video (which could include footage of the nominee talking about their teaching, their teaching philosophy, or interviews with students and/or colleagues)
- A link to a website
- Ten (10) pages of teaching materials
Two references of no more than one A4 page each must be provided by people who are able to comment on the program's outstanding contribution to student learning against the assessment criteria. One of the referees must be from the Head of School, College or Division, unless otherwise negotiated with the Acting Director - Learning and Teaching.